This has benefits in excellent library management (in Lightroom, anyway), but can sometimes limit the tools a bit or make too many assumptions about what users want/need, and they’re primarily focused on profiting for their shareholders. These are good too, and while these corporations have a background in image softwares, they’re primarily profit-driven and so focus on delivering to the broadest constituency.
Then, there are the for-profit offerings from Adobe and Corel. I’m not sure why, but RawTherapee has no library, nor does LightZone, and the one in darktable is strange and hard to use-it seems to be little more than a front end for the file system, but one without any visible structure. Strangely, these are often a bit lacking in the library department.
#Iridient developer for olympus review software
Open source software developers tend to be photographers or image enthusiasts in addition to coders, and therefore build in things that they find useful or have a need for. As I showed in earlier reviews, the Open Source softwares are no slouches in the image-manipulation department and the major commercial offerings have money (and, in some cases) strong brand recognition behind them. Will these tests verify that result? Allahu Alim.Ĭ1P started providing support for other camera manufacturers some time ago and introduced a catalog structure in version 7, so this puts it in a bit of a different league than other softwares tested here. If you surf the comment sections of Lightroom and other software reviews (I don’t recommend it, and you won’t find any here, since no one comments here) you’ll invariably see claims that C1P produces superior results to Lightroom and other softwares. It has excellent tethering support and this interesting and useful-sounding way of dealing with images called ‘Sessions,’ which I may or may not (will not, it ends up) go into later. How does it measure up? Well, read on and find out… General CommentsĬapture One (hereafter ‘C1P’) is made by Phase One-makers of medium format digital cameras and backs-and was originally designed to be used with files from their backs in studio settings. Then, while trying-and failing-to come to a decision about Lightroom CC or 6, and after running across 8 or 10 articles and comments about Capture One and its purportedly superior RAW conversion, I decided to give it a try. It currently doesn’t support files from the Olympus C5050, a 13 year old camera that I enjoy playing with from time to time, and so it was automatically excluded from consideration. To be perfectly honest, I had no plans to test Capture One.
#Iridient developer for olympus review pro
It handles other colors very well, just the red.Program: Capture One Pro 8 (8.3.3) Platforms Tested Available: Mac, Windows Price: $299 Installation: Very usual. If anyone has the same experience and has a solution, I am all ears. I tried several different ways to fix it but it's hard. A red flower will look fine with details in LR, but when loaded into IR, the red tends to become much more saturated and "blended" (so you get a big block of red, rather than individual red petals). P.P.S., I did notice a troublesome flaw with the way IR processes the color red.
I would love to use LR for everything, but at this point, can't. Since I can see it and am bothered by the smudging, I am now using both (IR for sharpening, and everything else with LR). P.S., if you can't see the difference and are not bothered by it, keep using LR. Check out this guy's blog post: ĭisclaimer - not related to IR or the blog owner.
I think it's just the different ways LR and IR process the sharpening. Sure, it increases my PP time and file size (I only keep the tiff, which is like 3 times larger than RAF), but for the IQ, it's totally worth it. I wasn't buying the "difference" at first, but now I am a believer. I take a lot of flower close-ups so this is very important to me. However, when I sharpen the same file in IR, the leaves/flowers retain amazing details - no smudging whatsoever. No matter how I move the sharpening sliders in LR, the leaves/flowers always seem just a bit smudged/murky. I can see quite a difference between the two files.
0 kommentar(er)
