It’s not surprising that broadband providers completely ignore any online speed tests that have been performed by their customers. In most cases, because of the many factors involved, they may indicate that your broadband connection is performing much worse than it really is. You need to be very cautious with online speed tests. We identify the best and worst online speed tests. I am beginning to think that the speedtest is highly unreliable.We’ve lost count of the number of people that have told us that their broadband connection is not working properly because an online speed test has reported low or highly variable speeds. I can't understand how this is possible.Īlso - regarding doing multiple tests concurrently - I have run as many a 4 tests at the same time with wildly different speeds that average well over 1G and has reached as much as 1.6G (!).
SPEEDTEST BY OOKLA LATENCY TEST ERROR WINDOWS
While the browser version (no matter which browser I user) shows a speed of 300-350M, the CLI and the windows version show over 800M. I have been using the browser version for all of my testing but I have tried both the Windows (install) version and the stand-alone line (CLI) version. My issue is actually with the speedtest itself. They have tested the local drop with their equipment and told me that the problem lies there - it is incapable of over 500M and with a number of local users I'm lucky to get the speed I do get. They have reset and swapped out the modem multiple times with no improvement. I have had Rogers techs here 4 times and every one of them have had exactly the same speeds when they do their tests. My average speed for January 2020 was 320.71M with over 150 speed tests). In summary I have seen speeds of about 300-350M for many months now (I have the 1G plan). I have documented my speed problems at length here in September/October or 2019.
SPEEDTEST BY OOKLA LATENCY TEST ERROR CODE
The code is so bad, and because its not loading in the part, it doesnt load the rest
I have seen sites, which will only load like 3 lines of the site then thats it, because of the blockers. They are a good thing.īut sometime its the SITE thats the problem, even if they are not trying to do something bad I completely understand the need and how/why people due use the blockers. Its quite possible, for recording and/or keeping past speed test results, location, etc, that its just trying to write a cookie to the machine to store that information. Yes, this is used primarily by Ads, where the specific add company when you go to say walmarts site, it writes to a cookie on your machine (or collects to their side) that you visited there, and then when you go somewhere else, reads that you went there and shows you walmarts on that site as well, etc. "Privacy Badger was born out of our desire to be able to recommend a single extension that would automatically analyze and block any tracker or ad that violated the principle of user consent which could function well without any settings, knowledge, or configuration by the user which is produced by an organization that is unambiguously working for its users rather than for advertisers and which uses algorithmic methods to decide what is and isn't tracking."īUT from that description, its based on anything which 'tracks' any information.
0 kommentar(er)
